Astro sites that weigh next to nothing.
New sites built on Astro from a blank page, or old ones moved off WordPress, Webflow and Next.js with every ranking intact.
Start fresh, or bring your site with you.
Same team, same Astro stack, same weekly previews. The only difference is where week one begins.
Starting fresh
No site yet, or a rebrand that deserves a clean slate.
Moving to Astro
On WordPress, Webflow, Next.js or Gatsby, and keeping every ranking.
Your content is fine. The platform under it isn’t.
Same homepage, weighed twice. Most of the old page is code your visitors download and never use.
Every edit waits on a developer
A headline change sits in a ticket queue for a week.
Plugins you’re afraid to update
Each update risks breaking the forms, the checkout, or both.
Slow where it counts
Most visits come from phones, and phones feel every kilobyte.
Rankings that slip
Weak Core Web Vitals hand your position to faster competitors.
Hosting bills that creep
You pay a server to rebuild the same page for every visitor.
Content you can’t take with you
Proprietary builders keep your pages when you decide to leave.
Four ways in. One way out.
Each platform has its own traps. These are the playbooks we run, and what your team keeps on the other side.
WordPress to Astro
Themes and plugins become typed components. Posts move to Sanity or Markdown.
URLs, SEO metadata, the media library
Webflow to Astro
Interactions are rebuilt clean. CMS collections become content collections.
The design, every slug, every CMS item
Next.js to Astro
Client bundles go. React stays only in components that need it.
Components, routes, API endpoints
Gatsby to Astro
The GraphQL data layer is replaced by content collections.
Markdown, images, page structure
of Astro sites pass Core Web Vitals on mobile. WordPress sites manage 44%.
Share of origins with good Core Web Vitals, mobile. Source: HTTP Archive CWV Technology Report.
Still on the Fence
